Ricky Nolasco to Join the Twins

As first reported by Chris Cotillo, the Twins have agreed to terms with right-hander Ricky Nolasco. Nolasco, one of the top free agent starters this offseason, has a 3.75 career xFIP, but is notorious for underperforming his peripherals, with a 4.34 career ERA.

It was reported days ago that the Blue Jays were circling Nolasco. While the Jays have likely checked in on just about everyone, this eliminates another potential target for AA and crew.

Worth noting is that Nolasco has changed his twitter icon to that of a Minnesota Twins logo, all but confirming his destination.

Credit to @AlexHalsted for the photo.

Jeff Passan has the financials, reporting that the deal is 4 years, $49M guaranteed. $1M of that total is the buyout on a 2018 team option.

favicon

This deal is a huge bargain for the Twins if you believe in Nolasco’s Fangraphs WAR. Fangraphs WAR is based on FIP, and it thinks Nolasco has been about a 3 win true talent pitcher in each of the last 6 seasons. A projection of the next 4 years for Nolasco, starting with his 2014 Steamer prognostication, would total around 7.4 WAR including decline based on age. If a win is currently worth 7.5 million dollars, then in a world where the $/WAR inflates at 6% per year, Nolasco would project to provide about $59.5M in value for the cost of $49M. That’s a comfy $10.5M surplus for Minnesota.

But Nolasco gives us plenty of reason to not believe in his Fangraphs WAR. He has pitched 1312.2 major league innings in his career (all in great home pitching environments), during which he has drastically and consistently allowed more runs than his FIP would predict. Indeed, Nolasco’s career RA9-WAR and Baseball Reference WAR are about half that of his fWAR (10.3 and 10.8 vs. 20.0). If we average out his career RA9-WAR and bWAR to 10.55, and then discount his projected WAR for the next 4 years by a factor of 10.55/20, we would project that Nolasco will produce just $31.39M in on-the-field value during this guaranteed contract. That’s a not so comfy deficit of $17.61M!

The Blue Jays were rumoured to be “circling” Nolasco a few days ago, and based on the available information, I am inclined to believe that they dodged a negative value bullet here. Although it’s entirely possible that they were never really that interested, of course.

– Nikolai Ballevski

@NikBallevski

 

 

Bird Seed: Nolasco, Trade Market Taking Shape, Payroll, 5 Reasons to Sign Cano
Bird Seed: McCann, Peralta, Samardzija, Nolasco, Anthopoulos

Author: Jacob Danovitch

Jacob has been following baseball since he fell in love with it going to a baseball game at the age of four. He's played baseball from the age of six and plays competitive basketball as well. He fell in love with the sabermetric side of baseball after arguing about Yunel Escobar with a friend and using advanced stats to prove his case. Jacob enjoys music and reading in his little free time as well. He is a fan of the Maple Leafs, Raptors and Bills.

Share This Post On

2 Comments

  1. Hey Guys,

    Great work on this new blog. I have been reading lots of the content and really appreciate the more analytical approach taken as compared to the chemistry/heart filled articles seen in mainstream media.

    If i may offer a minor suggestion to the site layout:
    I find it difficult to read through older content sequentially (having to browse back to main window, then click “load more posts” several times). Perhaps adding a quick link to the previous/next blog posts at the bottom of your article would ease navigation.

    This would be similar to DJF/Getting Blanked setup, so I do not know the rules about using that feature but I feel it would add to the reader experience.

    In summary, great work. I will be checking in every day or so.

    Post a Reply
    • Thanks for the suggestion, I will look into adding easy navigation.

      Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>